Print Page | Contact Us | Sign In | Join
Latest News: Legislative Updates

Supreme Court to hear arguments against Affordable Care Act

Thursday, February 23, 2012   (0 Comments)
Posted by: Matt Gruhn
Share |
I attended a briefing this afternoon on the upcoming case the Supreme Court will hold, which may repeal parts of the Affordable Care Act.
Many small businesses and marine retailers are very concerned about the cost (affordability) of the Affordable Care Act (commonly known as Obamacare). From March 26 to 28, 2012, the U.S. Supreme Court will hear arguments in the challenge to the constitutionality of the Affordable Care Act. The arguments are scheduled for 5.5 hours over the three days, which is the longest time given to hear arguments in well over 100 years. It is expected these three days of argument will attract substantial media attention. However, very little has been reported on the case so far. As such, I want to present this brief of what is happening and what can be expected over the next couple of months.
As a reminder, the case is Florida, et al v. Department of Health and Human Services, et al. The case was brought by the attorneys general of 26 states and the National Federation of Independent Businesses. Since the Affordable Care Act was enacted in March 2010, dozens of legal cases have been filed against the law. Most cases have been dismissed on procedural grounds.

Of the small number of cases that have gotten past procedural hurdles, four cases have reached the Courts of Appeals. Of those cases, three courts have rejected challenges to the law (the Sixth Circuit and the DC Circuit upheld the law entirely, and the Fourth Circuit found the challenge to be premature under the Anti-Injunction Act). In the Eleventh Circuit, in a case brought by the attorneys general of 26 states and the National Federation of Independent Businesses, the court found the individual responsibility provision to be unconstitutional.  However, the court left the rest of the law in place and specifically found the Medicaid expansion to be constitutional.

The federal government has appealed the decision striking down the individual responsibility provision. The 26 states and the NFIB have appealed the parts of the decision that left the law in place. Neither party is arguing the case against the individual responsibility provision is premature; however, the Supreme Court has decided on its own to consider that question.
The Court has divided the case into four separate questions:
  • Is the challenge to the individual responsibility provision premature under the Anti-Injunction Act, which prohibits challenging a tax prior to that tax being imposed?
  • Is the individual responsibility provision constitutional?
  • If the individual responsibility provision is unconstitutional, what other parts of the law, if any, must also be struck down?
  • Is the Affordable Care Act's expansion of Medicaid constitutional?
The Court could issue a ruling at any time after the conclusion of the March 26-28 hearing, but it is most likely to be sometime at the end of its term in late June.
It is impossible for me to predict the Supreme Court's decision, but the Court is 5 to 4 on the conservative side and is generally predisposed to rule against precedent. Repeal of the Affordable Care Act has far reaching consequences affecting many long time precedents. This case truly is a once-in-a-generation event.
We will continue to watch this case closely and keep you up to date.

Larry Innis
MRAA Legislative Affairs

8401 73rd Avenue North, Suite 71, Minneapolis, MN 55428